Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are local authorities exempt from the CCA 1974?


dodgster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm new to the site and have not posted before so hear goes...

I was employed by a local authority and had an assisted car purchase loan under their assisted car purchase scheme which was being paid via monthly deductions from salary.

When I left their employ I offered to continue making payment however I did not receive a response. To me this was not uncommon as this particular authority are noted for this.

Fast forward two years when I am attempting to change mortgages I am advised that I have a CCJ...this was news to me as I had not received any documentation in respect of it. I telephoned my previous employers who basically told me to naff off also advising if I wanted any info contact the court.

I discovered that they had issued through the Northampton County Court Bulk section (which I understand has a reputation for hamming up matters). To cut a long story short I then applied to have the judgment set aside on the grounds that I did not receive any docs. Unfortunately I could not attend the hearing (due to a job interview) and my application was thrown out in my absence.

From reading through the postings on the site I have discovered under S127(3) of the CCA 1974 the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor.

I have now received back my Subject Access Request request and have discovered that not only was the actual agreement unsigned ( I only signed the application form), it is not in the prescribed format at it stretches over 6 sides of A4 paper. They also chose to supply a "copy" the agreement (as they chose to destroy the original in Oct 2008 is this normal in ongoing litigation? The loan was taken out in November 2002.It also appears (from the documentation which they have sent) that the particulars of claim stated that the debt was in respect of salary/wages quoting an invoice number which leads me to believe that the agreement was not sent to court for issue.

my questions are;

1) do I have grounds to challenge the judgment on the back of the unsigned credit agreement or is there something which precludes local authority loans from having to adhere to the constraints of the CCA 1974?

2) Is the judgment itself flawed as the "agreement" (or invoice as far as I can see) was not included in the court papers as the local authority have not included it in my Subject Access Request request.

I would appreciate some help as this milestone around my neck is destroying my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan/post up what they've sent you? We really need to see the agreement documentation before advising further, as it all hinges on it's construction. (Remove personal details before posting - there's a link to a beginners guide to CAG in my signature showing how to use Photobucket to do this)

 

I'll move you elsewhere as well.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll attempt to scan it on tommorrow. The agreement itself was not signed however my main concern is whether I seek to attempt to set it aside (again) and discover that they are exempt from the CCA 1974. Tthanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have attempted to upload the agreement (7pages worth) as (hopefully) you can see the indemnity premium is not in the body of the agreement and it is not signed by anyone. I have been advised that the original was destroyed in Nov 2008, not sure why this was done as it appears from the Subject Access Request that they are/were contemplating further Charging Order action. In addition the agreement was not filed with the court documents (just an invoice relating to an unsigned agreement) I hope someone can give me some advice on whether the agreement meets the standard required/is properly executed and whether theLocal Authorities need to subscribe to the CCA 1974-many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...